User talk:71.208.32.185

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions to Rodrigo Palacio and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Mattythewhite (talk) 12:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattythewhite:, I actually have an account already but it got blocked and I don't want to make a new one. I have already tried discussing for an unblock but it became way worse than I thought. It was first a week and now its indef. Cheers 71.208.32.185 (talk) 13:12, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cristiano Ronaldo

Yeah, I also didn't know how the vital article levels worked either. I just looked around and saw that Level 1 had articles like Life, Earth, Human, etc. while Level 5 had Gareth Bale. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 12:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nehme1499: Thanks for the edit once again 71.208.32.185 (talk) 14:34, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Independiente Medellín

For future reference, the next time you plan to do a long edit at any article, please try to split it and edit section by section instead of systematically reverting the entire article to accomodate your new contributions without any regard for others' contributions or any attempt to consider them in your edit, especially when they point out mistakes in the page or good faith fixes they have made to your edits. In this case, your edits have undone grammar corrections, adjustements to links that could be piped or should not exist (e.g. the current DIM chairman doesn't really meet any Wikipedia notability criteria, therefore he shouldn't be linked), and even removed a newly appointed manager from the infobox. Please consider and put this recommendation into practice. CodeMars04 (talk) 21:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CodeMars04: Sorry about that, I didn't mean to revert anything while I was editing and saving the article, I didn't get a message saying there was an edit conflict when I published it; I only noticed after my edit where I saw the differences in revisions and found out that you edited it and I mistakenly reverted all of that. 71.208.32.185 (talk)

Venetion Village

Speedy deletion requires fairly strict criteria to delete anything, since it goes essentially undiscussed. The criteria are listed here: WP:CSD, the article in question doesn't meet any of them. It might, or might not, be deleted if it were discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion, where the criteria are different. It also might, or might, be deleted by Wikipedia:Proposed Deletion. Both of those are less predictable as to the outcome (because of the way their respective criteria and processes work). Wily D 04:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Miller Grove High School (Georgia) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Miller Grove High School (Georgia) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/only-at-miller-grove) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

IP blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.208.32.185 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why am I IP blocked? I also can't create a new account

Decline reason:

This IP address is not directly blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: - it won't let me edit, and it shows me a different user account that I have never used on this computer. 71.208.32.185 (talk) 16:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's not enough information here to take action. Please exactly follow the instructions you are being given. --Yamla (talk) 16:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: not enough information, huh? What instructions do you want me to give you? The instructions it tells me are to appeal the block using the following template, or use URTS, which I cant use because I still have talk page access. I have read the blocking help pages many times. Please respond in a thoughtful manner. I know you can. 71.208.32.185 (talk) 16:37, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't following the instructions. You still haven't told us which account, for example. Maybe the block message tells you to use unblock-auto instead of unblock, in which case you should do so and should fill in the fields. Note that we'd basically never lift an autoblock, though, unless you have your own separate account. But at the moment, there's simply no way for us to take action here. Help us to help you, please. --Yamla (talk) 16:40, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: The account name is Matthewishere0. I have already filed an autoblock request, and you said I was not autoblocked. 71.208.32.185 (talk) 16:41, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop pinging me, please. There's no need to ping me with each response. I never said you were not autoblocked, I said you weren't blocked directly. I'm afraid there's nothing we can do here, Matthewishere0, a blocked user, is currently operating from this IP address. I will go ahead and block this IP address directly. You are free to avail yourself of WP:ACC to request an account. This will allow you to edit even though the IP address is blocked. At that time, they will ensure you are not the blocked vandal, Matthewishere0. --Yamla (talk) 16:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.